Haltbarkeit von Veneers

Aktuelle Studien zur Haltbarkeit von Veneers

Haltbarkeit von Veneers: Aktuelle Studien
  1. Aykor A, Ozel E.: Five-year clinical evaluation of 300 teeth restored with porcelain laminate veneers using total-etch and a modified self-etch adhesive system. Oper Dent. 2009 Sep-Oct;34(5):516-23.
  2. Cötert HS, Dündar M, Oztürk B.: The effect of various preparation designs on the survival of porcelain laminate veneers. J Adhes Dent. 2009 Oct;11(5):405-11.
  3. Layton D, Walton T: An up to 16-year prospective study of 304 porcelain veneers. Int J Prosthodont. 2007 Jul-Aug;20(4):389-96.
  4. Fradeani M, Redemagni M, Corrado M.: Porcelain laminate veneers: 6- to 12-year clinical evaluation–a retrospective study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2005;25:9-17.
  5. Laubach, G : Erfolge und Misserfolge bei der Veneertechnik. Ergebnisse einer 10-jährigen retrospektiven Studie. Quintessenz  2005; 56: 603 – 616.
  6. Wiedhahn K, Kerschbaum T, FasbinderDF.: Clinical long-term results with 617 Cerec veneers: a nine-year report.Int J Comput Dent. 2005 Jul;8(3):233-46.
  7. Strassler, H.E.: Long Term Clinical Evaluation of Cerinate Porcelain Veneers. J Dent Res 84 (Spec Iss A):Abstract 432, 2005.

Einige ausgewählte ältere Studien zur Haltbarkeit von Veneers:

Haltbarkeit von Veneers: Ältere Studien
  1. Peumans M, Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P, Vuylsteke-Wauters M, Vanherle G. Five-year clinical performance of porcelain veneers. Quintessence Int 1998;29:211–221.
  2. Peumans M, De Munck J, Fieuws S, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G, Van Meerbeek B. A prospective ten-year clinical trial of porcelain veneers. J Adhes Dent 2004;6:65–76.
  3. Smales RJ, Etemadi S. Long-term survival of porcelain laminate veneers using two preparation designs: a retrospective study. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17(3):323-326.
  4. Aristidis GA, Dimitra B.: Five-year clinical performance of porcelain laminate veneers. Quintessence Int. 2002 Mar;33(3):185-.
  5. Dumfahrt H, Schaffer H: Porcelain laminate veneers. A retrospective evaluation after 1 to 10 years of service: Part II—Clinical results. Int J Prosthodont 2000;13:9–18.
  6. Dumfahrt H.: Porcelain laminate veneers. A retrospective evaluation after 1 to 10 years of service: Part I—Clinical procedure. Int J Prosthodont 1999;12:505–513.
  7. Magne P, Perroud R, Hodges JS, Belser UC.: Clinical performance of novel-design porcelain veneers for the recovery of coronal volume and length. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2000 Oct;20(5):440-57.
  8. Kihn PW, Barnes DM. The clinical evaluation of porcelain veneers: a 48-month clinical evaluation. Journal of the American Dental Association 1998;129:747–52.
  9. Fradeani, M.: Six-year follow-up with Empress veneers. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1998;18, 216-225.
  10. Friedman MJ: A 15-year review of porcelain veneer failure–a clinician’s observations. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 1998 Jun;19(6):625-8, 630, 632.
  11. Shaini FJ, Shortall ACC, Marquis PM. Clinical performance of porcelain laminate veneers. A retrospective evaluation over a period of 6.5 years. Journal Oral Rehabilitation 1997;24:553–9.
  12. Nordbø H, Rygh-Thoresen N, Henaug T. Clinical performance of porcelain laminate veneers without incisal overlapping: 3-year results. Journal of Dentistry 1994;22:342–5.
  13. Christensen GJ, Christensen RP.: Clinical observations of porcelain veneers: a three-year report. J Esthet Dent. 1991 Sep-Oct;3(5):174-179.
  14. Strassler HE, Nathanson D. Clinical evaluation of etched porcelain veneers over a period of 18 to 42 months. Journal of Esthetic Dentistry 1989;1:21–8.